Performance

Last 28 days

Overall improvement

+45%

Core Web Vitals

Last 28 days

LCP

1.0 s

INP

120 ms

CLS

0

+90%

Performance

Score

1.0s

LCP

120ms

INP

0

CLS

case study

Planhat Project Optimization Case Study

Planhat Project Optimization Case Study

How performance & optimization initiatives improved Core Web Vitals, user experience, and overall site performance.

Client

Planhat

Focus

Frontend & Core Web Vitals

Type

Ongoing optimization

01 — Overview

Overview

This case study highlights the ongoing optimization and performance improvement initiative for Planhat — focused on frontend architecture cleanup, Core Web Vitals optimization, scalable component management, and continuous performance monitoring.

As the website rapidly expanded with new pages, integrations, CMS content, and marketing features, maintaining performance and scalability became increasingly important. At the time of optimization, the platform contained hundreds of CMS-managed pages, company records, integrations, editorial content types, and dynamic content relationships. The project focused on reducing technical debt, improving maintainability, and ensuring the website consistently passed Google's Core Web Vitals thresholds across both desktop and mobile experiences.

02 — Goals

Project Goals

The primary objectives of the optimization initiative were:

  • Clean up and simplify the frontend architecture

  • Create a scalable and maintainable component structure

  • Reduce technical debt by removing unused files, modules, and duplicate assets

  • Improve Core Web Vitals performance across desktop and mobile

  • Optimize CMS-driven content, media delivery, and asset management

  • Simplify responsive behavior and improve cross-device consistency

  • Resolve UI inconsistencies and layout stability issues

  • Establish a continuous performance monitoring process

  • Ensure the platform remains scalable as new content, integrations, and features are introduced

03 — Context

The Challenge

As the platform expanded over time, several technical challenges began affecting scalability and performance:

  • Growing complexity of Framer/CMS structures

  • Large number of hidden and duplicated components

  • Excessive breakpoint usage across pages

  • Increasing bundle sizes and rendering overhead

  • Slow-loading media and image-heavy layouts

  • Hydration-related issues causing flickering and performance drops

  • Continuous addition of new CMS collections and integrations

The challenge was not only improving performance once — but maintaining performance as the platform continued evolving daily.

04 — Architecture

Frontend Architecture Cleanup

One of the largest parts of the project involved restructuring and simplifying the frontend system.

Improvements included

  • Reorganizing component structures

  • Cleaning hidden layers and modules

  • Standardizing reusable components

  • Removing unused imports and files

  • Consolidating duplicate structures

  • Improving maintainability across CMS-driven pages

Result

The cleanup reduced frontend complexity, improved maintainability, and created a more scalable foundation for future CMS expansion and feature development.

05 — BREAKPOINTS

Breakpoint & Responsive Optimization

The project previously relied on excessive breakpoint usage, creating unnecessary complexity and inconsistent layouts.

Optimization work

  • Removed XL breakpoints entirely

  • Reduced redundant responsive rules

  • Simplified responsive layouts

  • Improved consistency across devices

  • Optimized mobile-first rendering behavior

Result

  • Reduced responsive maintenance overhead

  • More predictable layouts across devices

  • Fewer rendering inconsistencies

  • Improved mobile performance

06 — CMS

CMS & Component Optimization

A major effort was dedicated to optimizing CMS-driven structures and Framer components. Particular attention was given to high-volume CMS collections where rendering overhead could compound across hundreds of entries, making scalability and performance increasingly important as the platform continued to grow.

CMS collection enhancements

  • Added lazy loading for heavy collections

  • Enabled infinite scroll behavior

  • Improved filtering systems

  • Reduced collection rendering overhead

Component cleanup

  • Removed duplicated variants

  • Consolidated reusable structures

  • Simplified nested component hierarchies

  • Improved maintainability of CMS-integrated pages

Image optimization

  • Added optimized thumbnail image sizes

  • Resized and compressed heavy assets

  • Optimized hero images for LCP improvements

  • Reduced unnecessary image rendering

07 — PERFORMANCE

Performance Validation

While Lighthouse scores are based on controlled lab tests and can vary depending on network conditions, hardware, and test runs, they provide a useful benchmark for validating optimization efforts.

For a large enterprise website with hundreds of CMS entries, integrations, dynamic content relationships, and complex page templates, achieving consistent Lighthouse scores in the 90+ range represented a significant improvement over the site's original baseline.

Lighthouse Comparison

Metric

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Before

40

88

77

100

After

91

91

96

92

Lighthouse scores improved from 40 to 91 while real-user Core Web Vitals simultaneously moved into Google's "Good" range.

SEO score variations were primarily attributable to Lighthouse audit changes and did not reflect a decline in organic search performance.

Lighthouse scores are based on controlled lab tests and can vary depending on network conditions, device capabilities, and testing environments. While Lighthouse should not be treated as an absolute measurement, achieving consistent 90+ scores on a large enterprise website provides strong validation that the implemented optimizations had a meaningful impact.


More importantly, the site now passes Core Web Vitals using real-user field data, including a 1.1s LCP, 62ms INP, and 0 CLS, demonstrating that performance improvements translated into measurable user experience gains.

Lighthouse scores are based on controlled lab tests and can vary depending on network conditions, device capabilities, and testing environments. While Lighthouse should not be treated as an absolute measurement, achieving consistent 90+ scores on a large enterprise website provides strong validation that the implemented optimizations had a meaningful impact.

More importantly, the site now passes Core Web Vitals using real-user field data, including a 1.1s LCP, 62ms INP, and 0 CLS, demonstrating that performance improvements translated into measurable user experience gains.

07/A — Assessment

Core Web Vitals Assessment

Following the optimization effort, the website consistently achieved passing Core Web Vitals thresholds based on real-user Chrome UX Report data.

Following the optimization effort, the website consistently achieved passing Core Web Vitals thresholds based on real-user Chrome UX Report data.

The website achieved passing Core Web Vitals status while maintaining strong performance thresholds:

LCP

1.3s

Largest Contentful Paint

INP

Healthy

Interaction to Next Paint

CLS

~0

Cumulative Layout Shift

These results positioned the site within Google’s “Good Experience” category and created a strong SEO foundation.

07/B — OPTIMIZATION

Performance Optimization Work

The project included ongoing performance optimization across multiple areas.

Improvements included

  • Reducing Total Blocking Time (TBT)

  • Improving hydration behavior

  • Optimizing JavaScript execution

  • Lazy-loading heavy assets

  • Preventing layout shifts

  • Optimizing rendering order

  • Reducing oversized media usage

Hydration & script issues

A major issue was identified where a script attempted to manipulate page hydration behavior, causing flickering, performance instability, and potential rendering delays. The issue was isolated and fixed, improving stability and responsiveness.

07/C - before & after

Before & After Results

Homepage optimization

Before

  • Lighthouse Performance: 33–40

  • Heavy image loading

  • Slow mobile rendering

  • Large layout shifts

After

  • Lighthouse Performance: 91

  • Core Web Vitals: Passed

  • LCP: 1.3s

  • Healthy INP

  • CLS ~0

  • Improved rendering & responsiveness

07/D — Metrics

Real-User Performance Results

Using Chrome UX Report and PageSpeed Insights data, several important improvements were achieved:

Performance gains

  • LCP reduced from ~3.2s to ~1.3s

  • FCP reduced from ~4s to ~2s

  • CLS stabilized close to 0

  • INP maintained in healthy ranges

  • TBT significantly improved

Important observation

Performance data fluctuates daily depending on user devices, network quality, traffic conditions, and geographic regions. Because of this, monitoring became a continuous process rather than a one-time optimization effort.

Outcome

The site now consistently passes Core Web Vitals while maintaining Lighthouse scores in the 90+ range. For a large enterprise website with hundreds of CMS-managed pages, integrations, and dynamic content relationships, this represented a substantial improvement in performance, stability, and real-user experience at scale.

08 — Assets

Vectorization & Asset Optimization

The project also included extensive asset optimization work. Replaced hundreds of raster logo assets with vector equivalents.

Logo vectorization

Several company and integration logos were rebuilt as optimized vectors to reduce image payload sizes, improve visual consistency, enhance scalability across resolutions, and improve loading performance.

Following the vectorization effort, CMS collections were updated to use the new vector logo fields, and all legacy PNG logo fields were removed to simplify content management, reduce duplicate assets, and streamline rendering logic.

Integrations updates

  • Updated integration icon systems

  • Improved CMS management for vectors

  • Removed legacy PNG logo fields

  • Reduced duplicate assets

  • Simplified rendering logic

09 — Monitoring

Ongoing Performance Monitoring

As the platform continuously grows, performance monitoring became part of the ongoing workflow.

Daily monitoring included

  • Lighthouse audits

  • Chrome UX Report tracking

  • Core Web Vitals reviews

  • Mobile performance validation

  • Regression testing after deployments

  • CMS performance evaluations

Why this matters

Performance can quickly degrade as new pages are added, CMS collections grow, marketing content expands, and third-party integrations increase. Continuous monitoring ensured issues were identified proactively before impacting users.

10 — More

Additional Improvements

The optimization initiative delivered substantial improvements across maintainability, scalability, and performance. Other improvements completed during the project included:

UX & Layout Improvements

  • Refined page layouts and content structures

  • Improved grid consistency across key pages

  • Resolved responsive layout issues

  • Enhanced mobile carousel and navigation behavior

Site Updates & New Implementations

  • Implemented newly designed website sections

  • Rolled out design updates across existing pages

  • Added and configured reusable template-driven page structures

  • Improved consistency across CMS-powered experiences

  • Supported ongoing content and marketing initiatives

Technical Improvements

  • Optimized video delivery and media assets

  • Resolved rendering flicker and visual inconsistencies

  • Improved stack and grid structures

  • Refined component organization and maintainability

11 — Impact

Results & Impact

The optimization initiative delivered substantial improvements across maintainability, scalability, and performance.

Technical Outcomes

  • Lighthouse Performance improved from 40 → 91

  • LCP was reduced from 3.2s to 1.3s through frontend optimization

  • Core Web Vitals consistently passing

  • Frontend architecture simplified

  • CMS scalability improved

  • Technical debt reduced

Platform Outcomes

  • Faster rollout of new pages and content

  • Reusable template-driven page structures

  • mproved maintainability

  • Reduced duplication across components and assets

User Outcomes

  • Faster rendering and interactions

  • More stable mobile experience

  • Improved real-user performance metrics

  • Better overall browsing experience

12 — Takeaway

Key Takeaway

This project was not a one-time performance fix — it established a long-term optimization strategy for a continuously evolving platform.

By combining frontend cleanup, component restructuring, responsive simplification, CMS optimization, image optimization, and continuous monitoring, the platform now maintains strong Core Web Vitals performance while remaining scalable for future growth.

thegoodpeople

thegoodpeople

thegoodpeople

studio

studio

studio

© 2026 The Good People Studio LLC. All rights reserved.

© 2026 The Good People Studio LLC. All rights reserved.